<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Drafttek Draft Takes &#187; 2010 Drafttek Consensus Mock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drafttekblog.com/category/2010_cmd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drafttekblog.com</link>
	<description>Drafttek Draft Takes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:09:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will the Raiders See-more needs at LB with the (fingers crossed) new aquisition/</title>
		<link>http://www.drafttekblog.com/2009/09/10/will-the-raiders-see-more-needs-at-lb-with-the-fingers-crossed-new-aquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drafttekblog.com/2009/09/10/will-the-raiders-see-more-needs-at-lb-with-the-fingers-crossed-new-aquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>DrafttekStaff_Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2009 NFL Regular Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Drafttek Consensus Mock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 NFL Draft Topics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drafttekblog.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Sorry about the pun, everybody&#8217;s doing it &#8211; I wanted my turn&#8230;.
 
Anyway, down to business. With any luck, Seymour will be in the Silver and Black this season, and we can get a better sense of where our run-defense is weakest. With Seymour on the line, the other players can be held more legitimately accountable, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<div id="attachment_75" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 159px"><img class="size-full wp-image-75" title="seymour" src="http://www.drafttekblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/seymour.jpg" alt="  Richard Seymour" width="149" height="202" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Richard Seymour</p></div>
<p>Sorry about the pun, everybody&#8217;s doing it &#8211; I wanted my turn&#8230;.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Anyway, down to business. With any luck, Seymour will be in the Silver and Black this season, and we can get a better sense of where our run-defense is weakest. With Seymour on the line, the other players can be held more legitimately accountable, and can reap the rewards if success is achieved. After initial speculation, I asked our fearless leader at Drafttek to change the Raider&#8217;s primary need form DT to LB (once Khalif Barnes comes back, I&#8217;ve got faith in our OL, plus an OG or C would be a second rounder anyway).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Our LB corps is possibly the best in the business at defending against the pass. While last years numbers didn&#8217;t add up to the year before (interceptions, touchdown returns), the respect was still there. That said, Seymour was brought in, I believe, due to his 2-gap run-stuffing ability. Blame for the horrible run defense was tossed back and forth last year, with LB&#8217;s saying that the running back had a full head of steam at the second level, and D-linemen complaining at the lack of &#8220;stack and shed&#8221; ability from the LB&#8217;s. Having Seymour on the line, reduces the amount of complaints that can be lodged against the d-linemen, and the responsibility for shedding blocks and making plays is going to rest on the broad shoulders of the LB corps, and that&#8217;s where I feel our weakness continue to be exposed. It&#8217;s not that I didn&#8217;t feel that our d-line was free from blame, on the contrary I felt we needed (and would target) a big, Sam Adams style NT to play 2 gaps and tie up blockers. With both the play of DT Desmond Bryant, and the Seymour trade, I have downgraded that need, and instead focused on the LB corps. If Morrison and Brown (or Alston) can&#8217;t keep teams from running down our throats, look for that need to be top of the list come draft time.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But hey, it&#8217;s not all about me &#8211; tell me what you think. Is LB our top weakness? Do we need another WR? Will Seymour even show up? Always happy for fan interaction.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tim, YOUR Oakland Raiders Team Needs Analyst</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drafttekblog.com/2009/09/10/will-the-raiders-see-more-needs-at-lb-with-the-fingers-crossed-new-aquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
